<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL – Bad Execution Plan caused by ROWNUM, ROW_NUMBER is Possible Fix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/sql-%E2%80%93-bad-execution-plan-caused-by-rownum-row_number-is-possible-fix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/sql-%e2%80%93-bad-execution-plan-caused-by-rownum-row_number-is-possible-fix/</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous Random Oracle Topics: Stop, Think, ... Understand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:46:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narendra</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/sql-%e2%80%93-bad-execution-plan-caused-by-rownum-row_number-is-possible-fix/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Narendra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=256#comment-330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles,

Just tried the test case on 10.2.0.1 (I know, it is unpatched but that&#039;s all I have for 10gR2...). The results give impression that the setting of two optimizer* parameters is the cause behind change of access paths/plans, resulting in poor performance. How can we say that is not the case?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>Just tried the test case on 10.2.0.1 (I know, it is unpatched but that&#8217;s all I have for 10gR2&#8230;). The results give impression that the setting of two optimizer* parameters is the cause behind change of access paths/plans, resulting in poor performance. How can we say that is not the case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
