<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The INSTR Function will Never Use an Index? I will give You a Hint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/the-instr-function-will-never-use-an-index-i-will-give-you-a-hint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/the-instr-function-will-never-use-an-index-i-will-give-you-a-hint/</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous Random Oracle Topics: Stop, Think, ... Understand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Hooper</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/the-instr-function-will-never-use-an-index-i-will-give-you-a-hint/#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Hooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=2506#comment-1334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martin,

Thank you for mentioning that it is possible for Oracle to use an INDEX FAST FULL scan for this SQL statement is only the CHAR_COL column is included in the SELECT (I cannot recall if I tried that in my environment, but it certainly is nice that Oracle will use the index).  I certainly have learned a lot from test cases like the one in this thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin,</p>
<p>Thank you for mentioning that it is possible for Oracle to use an INDEX FAST FULL scan for this SQL statement is only the CHAR_COL column is included in the SELECT (I cannot recall if I tried that in my environment, but it certainly is nice that Oracle will use the index).  I certainly have learned a lot from test cases like the one in this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Preiss</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/the-instr-function-will-never-use-an-index-i-will-give-you-a-hint/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Preiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=2506#comment-1333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles,
I guess the index would also be used, if we use only the column CHAR_COL in the SELECT list. In fact I do not quess but see the INDEX FAST FULL scan, when I use your test case with this adaption (and without a hint).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,<br />
I guess the index would also be used, if we use only the column CHAR_COL in the SELECT list. In fact I do not quess but see the INDEX FAST FULL scan, when I use your test case with this adaption (and without a hint).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
