<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redo Log Buffer &#8211; What is Wrong with this Quote?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/redo-log-buffer-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/redo-log-buffer-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous Random Oracle Topics: Stop, Think, ... Understand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Hooper</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/redo-log-buffer-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Hooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=2690#comment-1497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the second paragraph, I should add that prior to seeing Chris&#039; comment I had only determined that the _LOG_PARALLELISM parameter does not exist in Oracle Database 11.1.0.7, but I suspected that there might be something else that is not quite right with the quote.

Regarding the first paragraph, it also does not help that the _LOG_SMALL_ENTRY_MAX_SIZE parameter does not exist in Oracle Database 11.1.0.7, but I suspected that there might be something else that is not quite right with the quote.

---

Something to think about is what might happen when this 10.1.0.x or 10.2.0.x database, whose instance is using a spfile, is upgraded in-place.  If the book&#039;s advice were followed to the letter and the value of these four hidden initialization parameters were modified, how much unnecessary downtime would be suffered?  As a DBA, do you really want to get into the habit of flipping hidden initialization parameters as a silver bullet for performance problems?

Speaking of silver bullets, where is that second edition ultimate oracle reference book that I ordered which was supposed to be released June 1, 2010?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the second paragraph, I should add that prior to seeing Chris&#8217; comment I had only determined that the _LOG_PARALLELISM parameter does not exist in Oracle Database 11.1.0.7, but I suspected that there might be something else that is not quite right with the quote.</p>
<p>Regarding the first paragraph, it also does not help that the _LOG_SMALL_ENTRY_MAX_SIZE parameter does not exist in Oracle Database 11.1.0.7, but I suspected that there might be something else that is not quite right with the quote.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Something to think about is what might happen when this 10.1.0.x or 10.2.0.x database, whose instance is using a spfile, is upgraded in-place.  If the book&#8217;s advice were followed to the letter and the value of these four hidden initialization parameters were modified, how much unnecessary downtime would be suffered?  As a DBA, do you really want to get into the habit of flipping hidden initialization parameters as a silver bullet for performance problems?</p>
<p>Speaking of silver bullets, where is that second edition ultimate oracle reference book that I ordered which was supposed to be released June 1, 2010?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Hooper</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/redo-log-buffer-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Hooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=2690#comment-1483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice start.

Bug in Oracle Database 9.2: http://www.freelists.org/post/oracle-l/Caution-on-LOG-PARALLELISM,1
Can&#039;t RAC Oracle Database 9.2: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21368263
Where is that darn parameter (checked 11.1.0.7): http://www.orafaq.com/parms/parm1192.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice start.</p>
<p>Bug in Oracle Database 9.2: <a href="http://www.freelists.org/post/oracle-l/Caution-on-LOG-PARALLELISM,1" rel="nofollow">http://www.freelists.org/post/oracle-l/Caution-on-LOG-PARALLELISM,1</a><br />
Can&#8217;t RAC Oracle Database 9.2: <a href="http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21368263" rel="nofollow">http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21368263</a><br />
Where is that darn parameter (checked 11.1.0.7): <a href="http://www.orafaq.com/parms/parm1192.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.orafaq.com/parms/parm1192.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_c</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/redo-log-buffer-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris_c]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=2690#comment-1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well the first thing is that the log_parallelism parameter was a normal parameter in 9.2 hidden in 10.1 and 10.2 and removed in 11g.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the first thing is that the log_parallelism parameter was a normal parameter in 9.2 hidden in 10.1 and 10.2 and removed in 11g.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
