<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Different Performance from Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition? 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/different-performance-from-standard-edition-and-enterprise-edition-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/different-performance-from-standard-edition-and-enterprise-edition-4/</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous Random Oracle Topics: Stop, Think, ... Understand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Hooper</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/different-performance-from-standard-edition-and-enterprise-edition-4/#comment-2159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Hooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=3686#comment-2159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who were blurry eyed before reaching the bottom of the page, take a very close look at the TKPROF output for the second to the last SQL statement (identified as &quot;For all parts, determine the number of purchase order line exceptions where a part was purchase from a vendor other than the preferred vendor&quot;).  The number of rows returned by each database is different!  That is possibly the most scary part of this blog article.

Also, take a look at the execution plan for the query identified as &quot;Comparing the most recent vendor for each part with the expected vendor for each purchased part that has either an OFFICE or SHOP product code&quot;  When comparing the number of rows returned by the WINDOW SORT PUSHED RANK operation, notice that a significantly greater number of rows are returned by 11.2.0.1 - might this explain the significant increase in the number of physical block reads?

There are some other interesting results in the output, but  I will let someone else identify those.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who were blurry eyed before reaching the bottom of the page, take a very close look at the TKPROF output for the second to the last SQL statement (identified as &#8220;For all parts, determine the number of purchase order line exceptions where a part was purchase from a vendor other than the preferred vendor&#8221;).  The number of rows returned by each database is different!  That is possibly the most scary part of this blog article.</p>
<p>Also, take a look at the execution plan for the query identified as &#8220;Comparing the most recent vendor for each part with the expected vendor for each purchased part that has either an OFFICE or SHOP product code&#8221;  When comparing the number of rows returned by the WINDOW SORT PUSHED RANK operation, notice that a significantly greater number of rows are returned by 11.2.0.1 &#8211; might this explain the significant increase in the number of physical block reads?</p>
<p>There are some other interesting results in the output, but  I will let someone else identify those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
