Comments on: Strange Timestamp Behavior http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/strange-timestamp-behavior/ Miscellaneous Random Oracle Topics: Stop, Think, ... Understand Mon, 13 May 2013 14:10:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Abd http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/strange-timestamp-behavior/#comment-2864 Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:50:39 +0000 http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=4437#comment-2864 Clear and good Explanation.

thanks

]]> By: Charles Hooper http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/strange-timestamp-behavior/#comment-2862 Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:14:54 +0000 http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=4437#comment-2862 Hi Ana,

That is a very nice test case that you built.

It appears that there is still a problem with Oracle Database 11.2.0.2 (and 10.2.0.5). In your test case, the trigger shows that :new.TS_ATU_DTR is still NULL until a value is explicitly set for that column in the trigger code:

DATA      TEXTO
--------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16-FEB-11 1:old.FLAG=123, :new.FLAG=321
16-FEB-11 1:old.TAG=teste trigger, :new.TAG=teste trigger
16-FEB-11 1:old.TS_ATU_DTR=16-FEB-11 06.02.33.827000000 PM, :new.TS_ATU_DTR=
 
16-FEB-11 2:old.FLAG=123, :new.FLAG=321
16-FEB-11 2:old.TAG=teste trigger, :new.TAG=10
16-FEB-11 2:old.TS_ATU_DTR=16-FEB-11 06.02.33.827000000 PM, :new.TS_ATU_DTR=16-FEB-11 06.02.33.978000000 PM

Maybe the results from 11.2.0.2 are close enough for your purposes?

]]> By: Ana Paula http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/strange-timestamp-behavior/#comment-2861 Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:07:44 +0000 http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=4437#comment-2861 Very good! I wrote that post in the forum and this article helped me a lot. I’ll change the version of oracle. Thank you.

]]> By: ghassem http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/strange-timestamp-behavior/#comment-2860 Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:29:45 +0000 http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=4437#comment-2860 It’s brilliant.
Thank you

]]>