<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Addressing TM Enqueue Contention &#8211; What is Wrong with this Quote?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/addressing-tm-enqueue-contention-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/addressing-tm-enqueue-contention-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous Random Oracle Topics: Stop, Think, ... Understand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: So&#8230; so you think you are ready to migrate to Oracle 11g ? &#171; Paolocastle&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/addressing-tm-enqueue-contention-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/#comment-4307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[So&#8230; so you think you are ready to migrate to Oracle 11g ? &#171; Paolocastle&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=5034#comment-4307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/addressing-tm-enqueue-contention-what-is-wrong-with-th... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/addressing-tm-enqueue-contention-what-is-wrong-with-th" rel="nofollow">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/addressing-tm-enqueue-contention-what-is-wrong-with-th</a>&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Log Buffer #226, A Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs &#124; The Pythian Blog</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/addressing-tm-enqueue-contention-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/#comment-3535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Log Buffer #226, A Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs &#124; The Pythian Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=5034#comment-3535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Charles Hopper tells us what is wrong with the quote &#8211; Addressing TM Enqueue Contention [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Charles Hopper tells us what is wrong with the quote &#8211; Addressing TM Enqueue Contention [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Hooper</title>
		<link>http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/addressing-tm-enqueue-contention-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/#comment-3524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Hooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=5034#comment-3524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is interesting to note that the two sample tables for recipe 5-15 and the SQL statement used to detect missing indexes on the foreign key columns in that recipe appear to be very similar to those found on this website page:
http://www.confio.com/blog/solving-waits-on-enq-tm-contention

Recipe 5-15 claims that the SQL statement used to detect missing indexes on the foreign key columns (also found in the above linked article with a very small modification to the table aliases and capitalization) finds &quot;all unindexed foreign key constraints in your database.&quot;  For extra credit, identify three problems with this claim (I am currently aware of three problems, but there may be more).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to note that the two sample tables for recipe 5-15 and the SQL statement used to detect missing indexes on the foreign key columns in that recipe appear to be very similar to those found on this website page:<br />
<a href="http://www.confio.com/blog/solving-waits-on-enq-tm-contention" rel="nofollow">http://www.confio.com/blog/solving-waits-on-enq-tm-contention</a></p>
<p>Recipe 5-15 claims that the SQL statement used to detect missing indexes on the foreign key columns (also found in the above linked article with a very small modification to the table aliases and capitalization) finds &#8220;all unindexed foreign key constraints in your database.&#8221;  For extra credit, identify three problems with this claim (I am currently aware of three problems, but there may be more).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
