Comments on: oci-24550 [3221225477] [Unhandled exception: Code=c0000005 Flags=0 http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2012/10/22/oci-24550-3221225477-unhandled-exception-codec0000005-flags0/ Miscellaneous Random Oracle Topics: Stop, Think, ... Understand Mon, 13 May 2013 14:10:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Charles Hooper http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2012/10/22/oci-24550-3221225477-unhandled-exception-codec0000005-flags0/#comment-4995 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:41:18 +0000 http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=6694#comment-4995 Colin,

A similar thought came to mind when I was troubleshooting the problem… on a positive note, at least the resolution to the problem did not require rebooting the core switch at work (the testing was performed on an isolated network).

I suspect that the same MAC address is used for the two interfaces so that a DHCP server is likely to issue the same IP address to the camera when the camera is rebooted after removing the network cable.

]]> By: Colin 't Hart http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2012/10/22/oci-24550-3221225477-unhandled-exception-codec0000005-flags0/#comment-4994 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:10:05 +0000 http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=6694#comment-4994 It’s not like there’s a world shortage of MAC addresses! Now they’re forcing people to reboot other hardware simply because you want to unplug one wire somewhere…

]]> By: Colin 't Hart http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2012/10/22/oci-24550-3221225477-unhandled-exception-codec0000005-flags0/#comment-4993 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:57:55 +0000 http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/?p=6694#comment-4993 WTF are they using the same MAC address on 2 different interfaces? Stupid people…

]]>